He also encourages resisting the temptation to optimize for the benchmark with the goal of win the contest at any price. Smaalders invites to choose benchmarks that really represent the customer needs or all the efforts will end up optimizing for the wrong behavior. Not all benchmarks selected will meet all of these criteria, but it is important that some of them do. If it takes days to get performance results, it will not happen very often. Runnable, so that all developers can quickly ascertain the effects of their changes.Realistic, so that measurements reflect customer-experienced realities.Easily presented, so that everyone can understand the comparisons in a brief presentation. Maintaining a history of the performance of previous releases is a valuable aid to understanding your own development process. Portable, so that comparisons are possible with your main competitors (even if they are your own previous releases).Nothing is more frustrating than a complex benchmark that delivers a single number, leaving the developer with no additional information as to where the problem might lie. Observable, so if poor performance is seen, the developer has a place to start looking.Repeatable, so experiments of comparison can be conducted relatively easily and with a reasonable degree of precision.In the “Performance Anti-Patterns” article, there are some highlighted points to determine, in this case, what for and how benchmarks should be run. In such white paper can be seen statements about benchmarks should explain what is about to be tested and why, and also they should do (or ease) a kind of analysis of the expected system performance. We found that most popular benchmarks are flawed and many research papers do not provide a clear indication of true performance. In this article we survey 415 file system and storage benchmarks from 106 recent papers. The white paper “A Nine Year Study of File System and Storage Benchmarking” summarizes this: Surprisingly, correctly doing benchmarks is something really difficult, because there are many possibilities to bring bad or misleading results and to omit things. So is responsibility of the customer to determine how the result will be applied in its productive environment. A benchmark program will never be able to reflect the so-called real-world experience just will reflect how well such program runs in the intended computer. Yet many organizations seem to buy hardware based on benchmarks rather than understand their workloads and buy hardware based on their requirements and, of course, budget.” (Newman, 2015) This explains why the customer needs to know exactly what is meant to be measured. Sadly, many industry benchmarks are gamed. Now, “having an industry standard benchmark is always a good thing, if the benchmarks are not gamed. The benhmarker can take advantage of the limits to confront, like system resources, virtual software environment, applications, processing load simulation, user load simulation, and system use simulation, among others and do whatever is needed to surpass such limits and give a questionable result. For more information, you can compare your results online.Benchmark programs try to analyze the “performance” of a computer based in a well-defined test bed (normally not even close as the final configuration of the computer). It presents an overall score, a graphics score, and a CPU score, allowing you to identify if either your CPU or GPU might be holding you back in terms of 3D rendering. When it's done running the benchmark, 3DMark will present you with an in-depth results screen. If your computer is capable of running it, 3DMark will automatically put it front and center, allowing you to simply click RUN to get the ball rolling. Since we're interested in 3D performance, the free Time Spy benchmark is perfect. If you want to see if your hardware is up to the task of running resource-intensive modern games, this benchmark is what you're looking for.ģDMark comes with a lot of benchmarks, many of which are only available if you pay for the premium version. This benchmark is primarily aimed at gamers, and its individual benchmarks are each designed to simulate games with 3D rendered graphics. A lot of the benchmarks are locked behind a paywall.Ī lot of our favorite benchmarks include 3D elements, but 3DMark is specifically focused on that task and an easy pick for the best 3D benchmark.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |